New research suggests episiotomy guidelines that may help reduce the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injuries.
New research suggests episiotomy guidelines that may help reduce the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injuries. M Stedenfeldt of the Norwegian Continence and Pelvic Floor Centre at the University Hospital of North Norway, Troms, Norway, and colleagues published their findings in a recent issue of BJOG:An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.
Stedenfeldt and colleagues conducted a case control study of women who had one vaginal birth in which they received an episiotomy (N=74). The cases included women who experienced obstetric anal sphincter injuries, which made up about half of the study population (n=37). The researchers matched cases and controls in regards to instrumental delivery. The study noted episiotomy scars and related measures, specifically looking at mean episiotomy angle, length, depth, and incision point.
According to the data collected, the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injuries decreased by 70% for each 5.5 mm increase in episiotomy depth and decreased by 56% for each 4.5 mm increase in the distance from the midline to the incision point of the episiotomy. Stedenfeldt et al. also found that the risk of these injuries decreased by 75% for each 5.5 mm increase in episiotomy length. The researchers failed to find a difference in mean angle between the women in the case group as compared to the women in the control group. However, they did find there was a “U-shaped” association between obstetric anal sphincter injuries and angle of episiotomy, with an odds ratio of 2.09; specifically, when the angle was smaller than 15 degrees or larger than 60 degrees, the odds ratio increased to 9.0 .
“Depth and episiotomy length were the most significant characteristics associated with less risk of OASIS [obstetric anal sphincter injuries] when compared with incision point,” Stedenfeldt and colleagues concluded. “Our findings might indicate that to unload the perineum sufficiently the episiotomy must obtain a certain length and depth.”
The authors noted that their study results can help clinicians, as these guidelines can potentially result in a reduction of obstetric anal sphincter injuries. “Episiotomy technique is a modifiable procedure, and it is therefore important to make note of the parameters referred to in this study,” they explained.
Stedenfeldt M, Pirhonen J, Blix E, et al. Episiotomy characteristics and risks for obstetric anal sphincter injuries: Hitt E. Episiotomy parameters linked to risk for injury during birth. Medscape News. March 2012.
S1E4: Dr. Kristina Adams-Waldorf: Pandemics, pathogens and perseverance
July 16th 2020This episode of Pap Talk by Contemporary OB/GYN features an interview with Dr. Kristina Adams-Waldorf, Professor in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Adjunct Professor in Global Health at the University of Washington (UW) School of Medicine in Seattle.
Listen
Reducing multifetal pregnancy through publicly funded IVF programs
April 26th 2024Learn how a mandatory elective single-embryo transfer policy in publicly funded in vitro fertilization programs significantly decreases multifetal pregnancy rates, offering insights into mitigating risks in assisted reproduction.
Read More
Higher preterm birth risk found following cesarean delivery at full dilation
March 26th 2024Recent research highlights an association between cesarean delivery at full dilation and increased risk of subsequent preterm birth, prompting further investigation into childbirth practices and outcomes.
Read More
Unveiling the complexities of preterm birth risk from nativity, ethnicity, and race
March 22nd 2024A recent study dissected the relationships between maternal nativity, ethnicity, and race in influencing preterm birth rates, shedding light on disparities and suggesting avenues for future research.
Read More