Cleveland Clinic begins charging for doctors’ time spent responding to some electronic messages.
One of the nation’s largest hospital systems has begun charging for some electronic messages its doctors send to patients.
On November 17 the Cleveland Clinic began billing patients’ insurers for messages that typically take more than five minutes to answer and require a doctor’s “medical expertise,” according to an announcement on the Clinic’s website. Among these are:
Message charges will be billed to patients’ insurers. For Medicare beneficiaries, that could result in an out-of-pocket charge of between$3 and $8. Most commercial insurers cover these messages at little or no cost to the patient, the Clinic says. However, patients with plans that don’t cover messages could see charges anywhere between $33 and $50.
“The provider looking at your message might be reviewing the information you sent over and changing part of your treatment plan, or recommending you get a test to learn more. They might need to look at your medical history and do an in-depth review of your records to make sure they give you the best possible advice,” according to the announcement.
The Clinic uses the MyChart electronic health record for its messaging system.
Providers aren’t billing for:
The Clinic’s announcement comes at a time of financial stress for hospitals and hospitals. The median year-to-date operating margin index for hospitals was -0.1% in September, for a ninth straight month of negative actual operating margins, according to findings in the latest National Hospital Flash Report.
Primary care doctors seemingly endorse getting reimbursed for electronic messaging. In a recent Physicians Foundation survey, 86% said reimbursement for responding to queries through emails, texts, or phone calls was an important tool for enhancing access to care and improving outcomes.
But PatientRightsAdvocate.org, a nonprofit organization advocating price transparency, takes a different view. In an article on cleveland.com, founder and chairman Cynthia A. Fisher calls the practice “egregious.”
“Billing them [patients] for electronic messages to their providers is just the latest attempt to wring even more blood from the stone,” she said.
This article originally appeared on Medical Economics®.
Buprenorphine use in pregnancy linked to decreased fetal breathing movements
May 18th 2024According to a poster presented at ACOG 2024, use of the synthetic opioid buprenorphine depressed fetal breathing in biophysical profile assessments, but had no significant impact on other factors like amniotic fluid index or fetal tone.
Read More
Laparoscopic RFA linked to enhanced pregnancy outcomes in uterine fibroid patients
May 18th 2024A recent study presented at the 2024 ACOG Clinical and Scientific Meeting reveals that laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation significantly improves pregnancy outcomes for women with uterine leiomyomas.
Read More
Identifying gaps in syphilis treatment and prenatal care among pregnant individuals
May 17th 2024Preventing congenital syphilis comes down to quick diagnosis and treatment of the infection in pregnancy, and the number of missed opportunities to do so in the United States continues to grow.
Read More